| • | = neoplastic proliferations  of T-lymphocytes that home to the skin |  
 | • | CTCL in which lesions evolve from patches into plaques and ultimately into tumors is termed mycoses fungoides  |  
   
the concept of a cutaneous T-cell: 
| • | the diverse clinical entities that comprise CTCL can be grouped together because they are lymphomas of cutaneous T-cells (T-cells that hone to the skin; their job presumably is to patrol this organ) |  
 | • | cutaneous lymphocytes are CLA+  the ability to express CLA is presumably conferred on a lymphocyte during its activation in a draining lymph node by an antigen presenting cell that has migrated from inflamed skin |  
 | • | vast majority of CTCL = CD4+ T-cells |  
 | • | in leukemic CTCL, circulating malignant cells are CD45RO+, CLA+ |  
   
clinical:  
| • | tend to be distributed asymmetrically  |  
 | • | predilection for area of skin that are protected by two layers of clothing such as the buttocks and breasts (girdle distribution) |  
   
VARIATIONS (based on clinical appearance): 
| • | clinical picture is dominated by a poikilodermatous appearance |  
  | 
 
 
 
| • | AKA Woringer-Kolopp disease |  
 | • | characterized by prominent epidermotropism and a benign prognosis |  
 | • | some consider it to be a localized form of MF, whereas others argue it is a distinct clinicopathologic entity |  
 | • | presents as a solitary, slowly enlarging, erythematous, scaly plaque on an extremity |  
 | • | (or a group of lesions limited to one area, usually acral) |  
 | • | long duration and slow growth are characteristic |  
 | • | histology:  many lymphocytes in the epidermis, reminiscent of Paget’s disease |  
  | 
 
 
 
| • | a rare disorder most commonly found in Japan |  
 | • | characterized by pruritic flat-topped papules that spare the skin folds = the “deck chair sign” |  
 | • | considered a form of erythroderma in the elderly by some and a paraneoplastic syndrome by others |  
 | • | frequently there is an associated blood eosinophilia |  
 | • | histology – dense lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, eosinophils in papillary dermis |  
 | • | not enough cases have been reported to determine a true association with malignancies |  
  | 
 
 
 
| • | a form of CTCL in which the lymphocytic infiltrate is associated with a granulomatous component and destruction of cutaneous elastic tissue |  
 | • | patients develop large regions of lax skin, especially in the axillae and groin |  
  | 
 
 
 
| • | a variant of patch or early plaque stage MF that is seen in dark skinned patients |  
 | • | patients respond to therapy by repigmenting  |  
 | • | relapse is often heralded by a return of hypopigmentation |  
  | 
 
 
 
  
Sezary syndrome – best applied to patients with leukocytosis and Sezary cells 
erythrodermic CTCL – a broader term that encompasses all stages of erythrodermic and leukemic disease (whether or not Sezary cells are identified in the blood) 
  
| • | Pautrier’s microabscesses = a tightly packed cluster of lymphocytes in the epidermis surrounded by a clear space;  a fairly specific finding, though not present in the majority of biopsies |  
 | • | histology may vary with type of lesion: |  
 | • | patch and plaque – cyologic atypia not striking;  band-like infiltrate unassociated with vacuolar alteration;  epidermotropism without spongiosis |  
 | • | tumor stage – nearly always have striking nuclear atypia;  less epidermotropism (suggesting that the malignant t-cells are less dependent on the epidermal microenvironment for growth) |  
  | 
 
 
 
  
TREATMENT (for patch and plaque stage): 
| • | works by delivering a lymphocyte-toxic mustard chemotherapy to the entire skin – the domain of the cutaneous lymphocyte |  
 | • | cutaneous lymphocytes are re-circulating through the skin, the proliferative rates of the  malignant cells are low enough to require long term treatment to therapeutically reduce their numbers ( = principle behind maintenance treatment) |  
 | • | apply nightly to whole body surface until remission, then QOD X 6months, then Qweek X 1 year |  
 | • | hypersensitivity and primary irritant reactions |  
 | • | hypo- and hyperpigmentation |  
 | • | second cutaneous malignancies |  
  | 
 
 
 
  
| • | applied to total skin QD until the inevitable irritant reaction occurs, or for a maximum of 6 to 8 weeks |  
 | • | in general, one achieves a remission within a few weeks |  
 | • | advantages over nitrogen mustard:  shorter treatment course |  
 | • | contact hypersensitivity (10%);   severe erythema (35%);   post-treatment telangiectasia (35%) |  
 | • | mild bone marrow suppression (30%),  therefore monitor CBC |  
  | 
 
 
 
  
| • | TIW until mostly clear;  then BIW until complete remission  |  
 | • | then Qweek X 1year;  then QOweek X 2 years  (d/c after 5 years of remission) |  
  | 
 
 
 
  
| • | because electrons penetrate only to the dermis, electron beam therapy may be used without systemic effects |  
 | • | local side effects minimized when total dose is highly fractionated |  
 | • | as total dose increases, so does risk of SCC and radiodermatitis |  
  | 
 
 
 
  
| • | extracorporeal photochemotherapy |  
 | • | DAB-IL2 (diphtheria A toxin interleukin 2 gene fusion product) |  
 | • | methotrexate,  etoposide,  fludarabine monophosphate, interferon |  
  | 
 
 
 
  
 |